1. In the general
description of Act No. 5 of 1986 on the State Administrative Court explained
that the Civil Procedure that is used in the Process State Administrative
Procedure Law has similarities with that used in the General Court for civil
matters with a few differences (Anonymous, 1986 - explanation).
(Rozali Abdullah,Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara,hlm.1)
2. In terms of
a trial judge adopted
the State Administration is (Article 14.UPTUN):
a) Indonesian citizen.
b) devoted to God Almighty.
c) Loyal to Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution.
d) Not a former member of the banned Communist Party, including its mass organizations, or not the people involved langsug or indirectly in the Counter-revolution movement .30/PKI or other banned organizations.
e) Public Servant.
f) Law degree or another scholar who has expertise in the field of state administration.
g) as low Aged 25 years.
h) charismatic, honest, fair and of good character.
a) Indonesian citizen.
b) devoted to God Almighty.
c) Loyal to Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution.
d) Not a former member of the banned Communist Party, including its mass organizations, or not the people involved langsug or indirectly in the Counter-revolution movement .30/PKI or other banned organizations.
e) Public Servant.
f) Law degree or another scholar who has expertise in the field of state administration.
g) as low Aged 25 years.
h) charismatic, honest, fair and of good character.
(Rozali Abdullah,Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara,hlm.15)
3. The terms to be
appointed as Registrar of the High Court is the State Administration (Article
29. UPTUN):
a) Indonesian citizen.
b) devoted to God Almighty.
c) Loyal to Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution.
d) Certified law degree.
e) Experience of at least 4 years as Registrar.
a) Indonesian citizen.
b) devoted to God Almighty.
c) Loyal to Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution.
d) Certified law degree.
e) Experience of at least 4 years as Registrar.
(Rozali Abdullah,Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara,hlm.17)
4. Law of the State
Administrative Court event starts from the assumption that a Board decision or
Administrative Acting was always legal according hukum.Oleh Therefore, during
the decision-making bodies or state administrative officials in the disputed it
has not been disconnected or validity tested by Judge , and that decision must
be legally valid, so that the disputed decision is still considered by law to
be implemented. (Martiman, 1993:22).
(Kaligis,Praktek-Praktek Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara
Di Indonesia,hlm.1)
5. Article 3
Paragraph (1) states: If the
agency or the
State Administrative Officer does
not issue a decision, while
it is a duty, it
is equated with the Administrative Decision.
(Kaligis,Praktek-Praktek Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara
Di Indonesia,hlm.119)
By: Wawan ferri
andianto
NIM: (11220056)
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar